Skip to content
FOR BUSINESS LEADERS · BARRIEREBarriere

Built in Canada.Ready for more.

A Kamloops project supervisor considering L-1A should show actual authority and responsibilities, not merely responsibility for finishing a project. The qualifying corporate relationship, foreign employment and U.S. managerial or executive role all require evidence. Supervision can describe very different kinds of work. A sound L-1A review follows three tracks at once: the corporate relationship, the employee’s qualifying foreign history, and the future U.S. role. Write each track separately before combining them. The useful output is a dated organizational narrative showing who owns the entities, who performs the business work, and what authority the transferee will actually exercise. That discipline exposes gaps that a senior title can otherwise hide. This approach also makes it possible to identify early whether a staffing or role change is needed before the transfer, rather than offering a conclusion based on an aspirational organization chart.

Talk about L-1A
PurposeExecutive or managerial transfer
Company linkQualifying related businesses
New officeA distinct evidence requirement

IN THIS GUIDE · Distinguish project supervision from the proposed managerial role

01

Identify the decisions the applicant controls

Hypothetical example: a supervisor assigns daily tasks but also performs the main technical work. Describe resource decisions, reporting responsibilities and personal delivery duties separately. Do not turn coordination language into a claim that the applicant primarily manages when the real work remains operational. Use examples of hiring, budget, policy, and performance decisions to show discretion. Merely listing people who report to the applicant does not show whether the role is mainly managerial.

02

Show how execution is supported

Identify who carries out the underlying services and how the proposed manager is relieved of that work. A function-manager analysis concerns primarily managing the function rather than performing it. Headcount alone is not decisive; the actual structure and duties must be explained. Reconcile corporate documents with payroll and operational records. A relationship may be legally valid while the actual employment chronology still needs clearer proof.

03

Document the qualifying transfer

Provide ownership and control records and relevant foreign employment dates, locations and duties. The required foreign employment within the applicable lookback period needs individual assessment, and U.S. days do not count toward the foreign year. A transfer memo alone does not establish every historical fact. A launch plan should identify premises, funded personnel, expected revenue, and the point at which the role becomes predominantly managerial. Registration and a proposed title alone are thin evidence.

04

Apply the right operating-stage requirements

If the U.S. organization has been doing business for less than one year, assess L-1A new-office requirements, including sufficient premises, required foreign managerial or executive employment and ability to support the intended managerial or executive role within one year of approval. Mere registration does not establish doing business. Preserve travel calendars and pay records early. They can answer continuity and cap questions more reliably than memories after a business expansion.

05

Establish the qualifying foreign year and active organizations

The foreign employment generally must include one continuous qualifying year within the relevant preceding three-year period, assessed on the individual facts. U.S. days do not count toward that foreign year; a trip should not automatically be treated as breaking continuity. The qualifying organization must do business in the United States and at least one other country during the relevant period, through regular, systematic and continuous provision of goods or services rather than registration alone. The maximum L-1A stay is seven years. L-1A normally permits no more than seven years in the classification. Count earlier L periods and evaluate any available recapture evidence before making a multi-year staffing promise.

06

Test the transferee before choosing the blanket-L route

Choose the blanket-L route only after testing the person’s evidence. Blanket L petitions preapprove qualifying related organizations, not individual beneficiaries. Each beneficiary must still qualify, and a consular officer may refuse a blanket application that is not clearly approvable. Build the applicant file before choosing how to present it: verify the foreign employment period and qualifying capacity, isolate the proposed U.S. managerial or executive duties, and match the proposed authority to the supported U.S. structure. Hypothetical example: a Kamloops irrigation-controller manufacturer names its finance and operations director for transfer to an established U.S. affiliate covered by a blanket petition. Corporate eligibility does not settle whether her proposed U.S. work is primarily managerial: recent records show both budget authority and recurring production troubleshooting. The company should compare calendars, decision memoranda, subordinate job descriptions, and the proposed duty schedule, then explain who will perform routine analysis after transfer. If those documents leave the individual case unclear, the blanket approval cannot fill the gap; the employer should resolve the role and evidence before proceeding.

PUT THE DETAILS TO WORK

Guides for your next decision.

L-1A · BARRIERE

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.