Only if the actual duties are engineering. A superintendent role whose substance is crew supervision and production targets is not the Engineer profession, however qualified the applicant is. The title can be changed but the duties must genuinely be professional.
The job description outranks the job title
Hypothetical example: TN asks two questions that are decided separately. The applicant must hold the credential the profession lists, and the position must require and consist of that profession's work. Priya passes the first question with her degree. The second question is decided by what she will do each day. A superintendent who allocates crews, manages shift performance and signs off timesheets is managing a production unit, and an officer reading that letter can refuse the case even though an engineer is doing the job. Where the real work is pit design, ground-control review and reconciliation of mined tonnes against the plan, the letter should say so and the title should follow the work. The remedy is never to disguise supervision as engineering. It is to ask the employer which job it is actually hiring for, and to accept that a management job may need a different category or a different employer structure altogether.
Hypothetical example: Mateo, a Canadian landscape architect, is offered a role that mixes site design with supervising a landscaping crew. His initial assessment should separate the design drawings, grading plans, and client specifications from daily crew allocation. The degree or licence record settles his personal qualification; the signed scope of work and duty breakdown settle the position. If crew supervision consumes most of the assignment, the employer should describe that honestly and reconsider the route rather than relabel field management as professional design.